Nonetheless, something about this film had so horrified the institution that they were prepared to set themselves up for what now looks like an almost inevitable U-turn. Understandably, the distributors of Centipede 2, Eureka Entertainment, protested, and few were surprised when the BBFC backed down.Ĭuts, it turned out, would resolve the problem after all. Yet at around the same time, the board that now deemed sexual sadism unacceptable in principle were prepared to countenance Antichrist, with its bloody semen extracted by forced masturbation, A Serbian Film, with its rape of a newborn baby, and I Spit on Your Grave, with its protracted scenes of rape and buggery. "Given that the unacceptable content runs throughout the work," concluded the board, "cuts are not a viable option in this case." So dismaying was this concept that Centipede 2 posed "a real, as opposed to a fanciful, risk that harm is likely to be caused to potential viewers" it might be in breach of the Obscene Publications Acts. This implied a "clear association between pain, perversity and sexual pleasure". Nonetheless, the board pointed out, the first film's arthropod was merely the product of a clinical experiment, but the new one grew out of "depraved sexual fantasy".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |